3/19/2021 0 Comments Suzuki Method Piano Youtube
The Directory is not a referral service, and the SAA does not recommend any specific teacher or SAA member.Why, then, I asked myself, were piano teachers so dependent on organized teaching materials instead of tailor-making a learning journey to suit each childs needs Food for thought. P.S. Please note comments from former Suzuki students about their training: Suzuki Founder and fraud allegations LINK.Students as young as 2 or 3 learned to play their instruments in the way language was acquired, through imitation.
I recalled black and white film footage showing hundreds of Japanese children lined up in rows with baby-size violins, bowed in unison. It looked like a public holiday celebration.) The music, a CD package of folk and classical offerings, featured Twinkle, Twinkle as a primer favorite that gave impetus to volumes of published Suzuki albums. They were hot-sellers nearly overnight David Cerone, a violin teacher at the Oberlin Conservatory during my undergraduate years, was the official player-soloist on all Suzuki recordings, making his effort a lucrative one. The philosophy of Suzuki instruction embraced an early immersion in instrument study without exposure to note-reading. It mimicked the sequence of language-learning with a delayed development of writing skills. Part and parcel of the Suzuki construct was aural absorption of recordings to the point of saturation. The child would listen to pieces he was playing and basically copy the melody, tempo, phrasing, nuance etc. During private or sometimes group lessons, the teacher was the leader with her copycat student as a full-blown follower. Peers, teachers, parents, and an assortment of relatives, provided a solid support system for the method, which could take on village proportion. Ironically, the Suzuki Violin method one day was magically transferred to the piano, with its original precepts remaining. Some Suzuki piano teachers, however, integrated traditional methods into their approach, while others were more strictly orthodox. Religious wars in the making) From my personal experience, piano student transfers who had been immersed in a pure Suzuki learning environment from age 4 or 5, turned out to have poor note-reading skills when I interviewed them at age 9, 10 or 11. One 12-year old admitted that her Suzuki piano training made her resistant to reading music. She had a nice hand position, supple wrist, graceful, relaxed arms and could be easily prompted through any technical routines (a tribute to her teachers technical skill and agility in the modeling process). Disadvantages of Suzuki instruction: 1) note-reading was far too delayed. The Suzuki-saturated students had considerable difficulty psyching themselves up to the cognitive challenge of staff note recognitiona Freudian predictor of notation avoidance pathologyN.A.P. COPYING 2) While it was valuable to have a good pianistic model for the physical side of playing, Im not sure making a child ingest one particular way of interpreting a piece, or standardizing it made sense. Having students churn out the same pieces at recitals fostered comparisons of performance between students. I once attended a Suzuki recital in four parts that lasted for three cumbersome hours. Pieces like,Twinkle, Twinkle were played relentlessly with little relief, though by and large, the Suzuki miniatures were delightful. Enlisting parents to be surrogate teachers during the week could be a living nightmare for some children How many moms or dads would have enough emotional distance to mentor their own kids Too many had little patience and made unrealistic demands on their children to play perfectly. On the positive side: The idea of mirroring back a good physical relationship to the piano in the earliest years of study was sound, but traditional mentors could provide the same, while integrating elements of note-reading into the lesson. Depending on a childs age and readiness, a teacher could expose children to parcels of notation in digestible form, as I had done with Rina when she started lessons with me at age 4. My approach to a child this young would be creative and innovative borrowing materials from varied sources where it applied. For example, I used Irina Gorins Tales of a Musical Journey as my springboard, but on my own, I developed simple duets based upon transcribed versions of Saint-Saens Carnival of the Animals. I didnt adhere to any deadlines, preferring to take cues from the child. Any other instructional modality, whether it be PURELY Suzuki-based, or a strict instructional path with little room for variation, didnt seem to work. Why, then, I asked myself, were piano teachers so dependent on organized teaching materials instead of tailor-making a learning journey to suit each childs needs Food for thought. P.S. Please note comments from former Suzuki students about their training: Suzuki Founder and fraud allegations LINK.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |